Thursday, July 24, 2003
Check this out -- The Shield Project
"Mark Davey" wrote:
"Everyone talks about the weather,
but nobody does anything about it."
The following is a letter (e-mail) written by a friend of a
correspondent. The writer appears to have an "inside track" on the
chemtrail spraying programme. There was an opportunity to ask
specific questions relating to the aerial spraying and the "insider"
then answered the questions.
I am aware of the insider's place of employment and the facts
presented conform with the type of activities that are carried out
there.
The responses have the tone of someone with detailed inside
knowledge but for reasons of confidentiality it is unsigned. Where
population is mentioned also see the Holmestead Population Explosion
page.
It is a lengthy piece but when you reach the end please
continue as there is a second item following.
At 4 April 2003 some supplementary questions and answers have
been added. This makes the piece even longer and again the related
item follows. If you wish to skip the first section and go directly
to the new material click: Supplementary.
Points to Ponder: The Shield Project.
Here we quote the communication from "Deep Shield":
Having read your email, I must say that you are full of
questions. These questions I would dismiss immediately as being the
frustrated attempts of fringe groups to bring a halt to the project,
however these reports of biological material being part of the spray
should be addressed. Therefore I will give as much attention to all
of your questions as possible.
1. What purpose do polymer threads imbedded with biological
material serve in this scenario?
Polymers are part of the mixture and they do form in threads
and in `tufts'. The idea is simple and comes to us from the spider.
As you may know spider webbing is very light, some newborn spiders
spin a `parachute' to catch the prevailing breeze to travel far from
their place of birth. Spiders have been able to attain high altitudes
and travel great distances for long periods of time. Most of the
elements used in the spray are heavier than air, even in their
powdered form they are heavier and will sink quickly. Mixing them
with the polymers suspends the particles in the atmosphere high above
the surface for longer periods of time, therefore in theory we do not
need to spray as often or as much material. Since the suspended
particles eventually do settle into the lowest part of the atmosphere
and are inhaled by all life forms on the surface there is an attempt
to counter the growth of mold by adding to the mixture mold growth
suppressants - some of which may be of biological material.
Mold comes in spores that travel on the winds; the polymers can
attract mold spores through static charges created by the friction of
the polymer threads and the atmosphere. Add a bit of warmth and
moisture and mold begins to grow. The polymer is stored in a liquid
form as two separate chemicals. When sprayed they combine behind the
plane `spinning' long polymer chains (threads). Much tinkering has
been done which the chemical matrix in past years. Many polymers
(plastics) are non-biodegradable thus add to the problem of
pollution. Various formula have been used, some which even use
biological agents. It would be great if we could reproduce the same
web material that spiders make, it is extremely strong, extremely
lightweight and breaks down relatively fast in the ecology.
2. If this spraying is to mitigate global warming, why does so
much of it take place at night?
Though it would appear that the dispersal rate of the spray is
fast, it is actually takes much longer to be an effective shield.
There is a desired concentration being sought. One that is thick
enough to stem the UV and the Infrared, while being thin enough to
allow visible light through. A perpetual cloud cover would have
disastrous effects on plant life; the food chain thus disrupted would
soon collapse. The desired effect wanted is a thin cover that would
theoretically create a daytime haze that allows plenty of sunlight
while providing protection. From UV radiation and also reflect enough
infrared to maintain nominal temperatures.
The optimal condition is to use the least amount of material to
provide the maximum amount of shielding. Ideally that would be a one-
time application which would stay suspended for years, however, as
noted, barium and aluminum and other trace elements are far heavier
than air and they sink rather rapidly. The different temperatures
between day and night causes massive volumes of air to rise during
the night, the warm air trapped at the surface rises above the
cooling air above. By strategically spraying in certain areas at
night, we get the advantage of the rising air, which not only pushes
the material higher, but also causes the material to disperse into a
thin layer.
I would suggest studying on the subject of weather, namely
highs and lows and how air moves to fully understand the times of
spraying. I note, it is not just global warming we are combating
here, we are also combating UV Summer. Global warming could
effectively be treated by applications during the night, when the
warm air rises. However the UV needs to be treated during the day.
This is why on some days one finds that more spraying is done during
the day. The UV indexes are monitored constantly for local areas. If
the problem were simply cooling the earth, rockets would have been
used to suspend particles in the high atmosphere. However the
delicate nature of the Ozone Layer precludes this method of
shielding. More on this in the answer to Question 6.
3. What other military programs are in place involving the
spraying of barium and what are their purposes? Do you know and
understand the chemical make up of the element?
A little knowledge will go a long way to understanding the need
to use barium: Barium is often used in barium-nickel alloys for spark-
plug electrodes and in vacuum tubes as a drying and oxygen-removing
agent. Barium oxidizes in air, and it reacts vigorously with water to
form the hydroxide, liberating hydrogen. In moist air it may
spontaneously ignite. It burns in air to form the peroxide, which
produces hydrogen peroxide when treated with water. Barium reacts
with almost all of the nonmetals; all of its water-soluble and acid-
soluble compounds are poisonous. Barium carbonate is used in glass,
as a pottery glaze, and as a rat poison. Chrome yellow (barium
chromate) is used as a paint pigment and in safety matches. The
chlorate and nitrate are used in pyrotechnics to provide a green
color. Barium oxide strongly absorbs carbon dioxide and water; it is
used as a drying agent. Barium chloride is used in medicinal
preparations and as a water softener. Barium sulfide phosphoresces
after exposure to light; it is sometimes used as a paint pigment.
Barite, the sulfate ore, has many industrial uses. Because barium
sulfate is virtually insoluble in water and acids, it can be used to
coat the alimentary tract to increase the contrast for X-ray
photography without being absorbed by the body and poisoning the
subject.
Note what Barium Oxide can do, absorb carbon dioxide - one of
the chief gasses causing the green house effect. In my answer to
Question 4 I will discuss the need to carry a current in the shield.
I would like to point out that barium and aluminum work together to
diffuse and strengthen an electrical charge. Somewhat like the
current produced when acid is introduced between two dissimilar
metals, such as iron and copper. There are military applications for
everything you can think of, can not a butter knife be used as a
weapon? The same concept holds true here.
4. What is the connection between ELF, EMF, VLF and Chemtrails
spraying? Or is there one?
To understand the use of radio waves in the shield, one first
understands how ozone is created. I cannot stress to you how dire the
situation really is. The shield in place is only a partial solution;
we must counter the depletion of the ozone- this means we must make
ozone in the stratosphere. Ozone at ground levels does no good;
indeed, ozone pollution at ground levels it what is used to determine
the air quality. Higher levels of ground level ozone mean that air
quality is bad. Pure ozone is an unstable, faintly bluish gas with a
characteristic fresh, penetrating odor. The gas has a density of
2.144 grams per liter at standard temperature and pressure. Below its
boiling point (-112?) ozone is a dark blue liquid; below its melting
point (-193?) it is a blue-black crystalline solid. Ozone is
triatomic oxygen, O3, and has a molecular weight of 47.9982 atomic
mass units (amu). It is the most chemically active form of oxygen. It
is formed in the ozone layer of the stratosphere by the action of
solar ultraviolet light on oxygen. Although it is present in this
layer only to an extent of about 10 parts per million, ozone is
important because its formation prevents most ultraviolet and other
high-energy radiation, which is harmful to life, from penetrating to
the earth's surface. Ultraviolet light is absorbed when its strikes
an ozone molecule; the molecule is split into atomic and diatomic
oxygen: 03+ ultraviolet light ->0+02. Later, in the presence of a
catalyst, the atomic and diatomic oxygen reunite to form ozone.
Ozone is also formed when an electric discharge passes through
air; for example, it is formed by lightning and by some electric
motors and generators. Ozone is produced commercially by passing dry
air between two concentric-tube or plate electrodes connected to an
alternating high voltage; this is called the silent electric
discharge method. Since UV radiation is the problem, we can not use
UV to produce more stratospheric ozone. Another method must be found.
The shield acts like one plate of the electrode, when tickled with
certain radio waves; it produces an opposite charge to stratospheric
layers producing low atmosphere to stratosphere lightening. Creating
ozone where it is needed.
5. If this is being done for the reasons you say, then why are
other chemicals being used, why are different sprays being used?
Correcting the ecological damage that mankind has done has
NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE. We are relatively new to this notion of
terraforming on a real scale. That is what we are doing,
Terraforming. We are trying to recreate the ideal life-sustaining
conditions on a dying planet. We have never done this before, not
intentionally. We are testing and trying different methods. Granted,
if we do nothing 89% of all species will go extinct and humanity
stands a high chance of not surviving through two more generations
(or less). However the idea of 2 billion casualties death and
permanent injury is not easy to swallow either.
Several attempts to improve the application of Shielding
material and getting the most out of each application are taking
place all the time. The combined resources of the nations of earth
are not enough to allow constant spraying. Though we have achieved a
high level of technology, there is a great surface area that needs to
be covered nearly daily. Large sections of ocean are all but ignored;
the remaining land masses are more than what can be covered
effectively. The Shield would work best if it was a single thin layer
with out interruption, however due to the movement of air, weather
patterns and the sad fact that we do not have the means to place
ample amounts of material at the same level at the same time we are
getting a small fraction of the effectiveness from our applications.
6. Why is spraying found before storm fronts? Is it to cause
drought?
Before a storm there is a front, the front clears the air
before a storm, pushing particulate matter ahead of it, leaving a
space relatively clear of particulate matter. UV radiation levels
rise in these areas, sometimes to dangerous levels. The shield must
be maintained. Since barium absorbs water as well as carbon dioxide,
precipitation has been affected. Other kinds of sprays are in
development and testing which may reduce the affects on
precipitation. As I stated above, this is a new technology we are
working with, it is still in its infancy and there are some problems
with it.
7. Why are UFO's and disappearing spray planes reported?
I do not know.
8. What about the reports of sickness after spraying?
There are several causatives for this. Some people are more
sensitive to metals, whiles others are sensitive to the polymer
chemicals. As stated in a previous email, people will get sick, and
some will die. It is estimated that 2 billion worldwide will be
affected to some degree by the spraying. Without spraying we have a
90% + chance of becoming extinct as a species with in the next 20
years.
9. What is the relationship between these spraying programs and
One World Order?
Personally I am against the move for globalization, and yes,
there is potential to use the Shield to speed up the process of
globalization, there are several countries that are involved in this
project: European Union Nations, USA and Russia are the largest
contributors to the project, many of the allied nations and UN
Members participate to one extent or another. The material (chemical
spray as you may call it) comes from all of these nations.
To insure that the chemicals are not tampered with, they are
mixed and sprayed over random nations. This means that chemicals
produced in the USA has a good chance of being sprayed over Russia,
England and the USA. This random spray of material means that no
nation would be certain that their chemicals will be sprayed over a
nation which they have issues with. Russian planes may be seen in USA
skies, but so too will USA planes be seen in Russian skies. The
canisters used are sealed in a third nation that has no idea where
its canister is going. Participating nations have their observers at
every station where canister loading is done. All of this to insure
that the shield is not used as a weapon. To further insure that the
shield is not used as a weapon, non participant nations are sprayed
by participants who must spray in order to get enough material to
maintain their nations shield. It is understood that not spraying is
as much a military offense as shooting at them.
Without the shield, UV poisoning would cause great death. The
threat is a common one, which has brought nations together in
defense. The natural outcome of having a common enemy is to
strengthen international ties - a step toward globalization.
10. Is the Spraying related to terrorism?
Yes and no. Recent terrorist activity can be traced to
resistance groups who feel that we should not interfere with the
natural order of things. As you know, there are many rumors out there
as to what the Shield Program is. Some believe that this is a
population reduction scheme, designed to kill off 'undesirable'
peoples. While others hold that this is a mind control program. There
are many theories which have sinister plots in them these are
propagated by the resistance groups in an attempt to stop the shield
regardless of the consequences.
The same delivery method could be used for biological and
chemical warfare. It could also be used to inoculate large
populations, the effectiveness of these uses are low, there are
better methods that can be used. As a means to fight terrorism it is
ineffectual, it is far easier to inoculate a population individually
and would insure full inoculation against germ warfare.
11. Why all the secrecy?
Due to the severity of the situation it is mandatory to
maintain public calm for as long as possible. The Earth is dying.
Humanity is on the road to extinction - without the Shield mankind
will die off with in 20 to 50 years. Most people alive today could
live to see this extinction take place. This means that an
announcement of the situation we face boils down to telling every
man, woman and child on earth that they have no future, they are
going to be killed. People would panic. There would be economic
collapse, the production and movement of goods would collapse.
Millions would die in all cities on earth, riots and violence would
reduce civilian centers to rubble within days. Half of the population
in dense metropolitan areas would try to leave the cities
seeking 'safety' in the rural areas thinking that they would be safe.
Those left behind in the cities would be at war with their neighbors,
fighting for the remaining supplies. We would be telling the world
that the world is coming to an end, and even with the Shield the
chances of survival are small.
UV Summer and Global Warming are the immediate problems we
face, there are far greater problems that are raising their ugly
heads and will present new problems which in some cases have no
viable solutions at this time. Ecologies are collapsing. The
extinction rate of species is climbing. The amount of chemical
pollutants in the water and soil are fast approaching and in many
places has surpassed the earth's ability to heal itself. Crop failure
is on the rise, even in the USA the returns on crops are smaller than
they were 10 years ago. Even with the advances in genetically altered
food crops, we are falling behind in our ability to produce enough to
go around. Throughout the 20th century chemical fertilizers and
pesticides were used to insure the best yields. Unfortunately many of
these have contaminated ground water, killed beneficial insects along
with the undesirable insects. These chemicals have gotten into the
food chain and are affected other species besides mankind. It is only
a matter of years before famine spreads like a cancer throughout the
world.
Clean fresh water is in short supply, in many places well water
is nonpotable, containing the run off of pesticides, herbicides and
fertilizers that have been used on crops and lawns. The water
treatment facilities we have are unable to scrub out all of the
toxins we have placed in the soil and water supply. Many of the
toxins we find build up over time in the body, a long slow poisoning
which has been making its presence felt in many areas of the world in
the form of cancers, leukemia, sterility, birth defects, learning
disorders, immune deficiency problems, etc. These are on the rise,
any good researcher can find the records. For decades there was
public outcry for the end to pollution. For every small step we made
to clean up our production, millions where born who added to the
problem. Yes, pollution is down per individual, however there are a
couple more billion individuals producing pollution, thus the real
numbers have an increase in over all pollution produced. Name a city
that does not have problems with smog. You would be hard pressed to
find one. Though smog controls on automobiles is higher than ever
before, the number of autos on the road has increased thus the amount
of smog producing pollutants is higher than ever before. All the
clean air acts passed to curb individual factory and auto emissions
did not address the production of more factories and more autos. Here
an uneasy compromise was made between the need to maintain the
economy against the need to maintain the ecology. The ecology lost
since it was estimated to be a problem decades from now. The economy
was a problem that would have dire effects today.
All of these factors combined have produced a scenario that in
shorts boils down to the end of the world in 50 to 75 years. Even if
we were to stop all emissions of pollution today, the inertia of past
decades is enough to carry us over the brink in 100 years. However we
cannot stop the production of pollution, to do so would mean shutting
down every factory, every auto, every train, truck, ship and every
household on the planet. Electricity is used to heat many homes in
the Western World. The production of electricity produces fewer
pollutants than heating all homes with wood or coal. Cutting our
power generation abilities down to hydroelectric and fission reactors
would leave a good chunk of the world in the dark. It is an
impossible situation, our civilization is geared to the use of
energy, take away our energy and civilization will collapse.
12. When will spraying stop?
There are several factors governing this:
A. Should the Ozone layer repair itself or our active attempts
at repair reduces the amount of ground level UV to acceptable levels,
spraying will stop. Present calculations place this between 2018 and
2024.
B. Should another method be found which is more effective, less
costly or presents us with long-term solutions the Shield project
would be replaced.
C. When the other problems become too big to make the
maintenance of the shield worth the effort. The estimated date for
this is 2025 to 2050.
13. Since Global Warming and UV summer are the problem, why is
the Government backing down on its pollution controls?
Because they are ineffectual and will cause more economic
problems than they would solve ecological problems. We surpassed the
threshold of Earth's ability to absorb pollutants in the 1970's.
Since that time the earth's population has nearly doubled. Emerging
Industrial nations have come into being, more pollutants are produced
now than back then, even with the stringent controls in place. The
world is heading for economic depression, more emission controls
would add to the economic problems. This translates into our being
unable to do anything to start solving the problems.
Unfortunately our technologies require a strong economy to
advance. We need that advancement, we need the trillions of dollars
spent on research that a strong economy causes. Each corporation that
produces a product has a product development program in place. Many
of the past products invented came by accident through other
unrelated products. There is a corporate drive to find methods to
clean up the ecology, to reduce emissions, etc. These goals have been
in place for decades, many of the large corporations are in the know
when it comes to the ecological problems we face thus they are
spending a great deal of money and time on finding solutions to the
problems we face. Take away the economy and their research stops.
14. How are you related to the Chemtrails? How do you know that
this is what is happening?
I would prefer to not state who I am or how I am related to all
of this. To validate what I say, would require a bit of research on
your behalf. I would recommend the following subjects to look up and
study:
A. Population numbers for industrial nations and the tons of
pollutants produced annually. Start with 1975 and work your way up.
B. Number of emerging Industrial Nations.
C. Number of cases of Skin cancers worldwide.
D. Crop Production vs. land area dedicated to crop production.
Simple math will show that more acreage is needed to produce food per
individual.
E. Automobile production from 1975 to present, estimated number
of autos on the road and the average emissions of later model cars
produced as compared the emissions of earlier model cars. A little
math will show that though individual autos produce less emissions,
the amount of emissions has risen due to the number of autos on the
road. Remember that many autos are the road that were built before
present emission control standards. 1980 is a cut off date - anything
put on the road before then produces more pollutants than autos
produced today. I would include research in the number of diesel
autos produced, diesel has not been under the emissions control acts.
F. Severity of storms and the number of severe storms. Also
include heat waves and droughts in that research, you will find that
the numbers are staggering when compared to data from 1950, 1960 and
1970.
G. Research how naturally occurring Ozone is produced in the
stratosphere. Compare to how it is produced industrially.
H. Research political reforms in the past 30 years, see which
political institutions have changed, which nations have joined with
whom. Concentrate more on these from 1982 onward. This would include
the fall of the Wall and Iron Curtain.
I. Research polymers and how they are made, look at recent
research done in biological polymers, medical polymers and filaments.
J. Check out spiders and spider web and the way spiders use
their different webs and threads.
K. Research clean fresh water estimates as compared to the
1970's to today - world wide.
L. Research the following medical conditions per capita: Birth
Defects Cancers Leukemia Immune deficiency diseases (excluding virus
borne ID illnesses such as HIV) Occurrences of Learning disabilities,
including dyslexia, ADD, and over all IQ tests Sterility for both
male and females world wide Instances of glaucoma and cataracts.
M. Compare the history of UV indexes from 1970 to present. You
may note that it was on sharp rise until 1997-99.
N. I would strongly recommend researching the reactions of
different barium and aluminum compounds and how they are used.
Research how long it takes for these metals in pure form to oxidize,
how they combine with nitrates, carbon monoxide carbon dioxide and
fluorocarbons and hydrocarbons and water vapor.
O. Research how mold propagates, the conditions it needs to
grow and just how abundant it is in the atmosphere.
If you pursue these lines of inquiry, you will see the Shield
Project as it really is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
At the time of the US-lead invasion of Iraq I had the
opportunity to ask a few supplementary questions. There has been no
attempt to integrate these questions and answers into the previous
section therefore some may appear somewhat out of logical order.
A couple of the questions have a Canadian approach. By the
way, I came up with the name - have to call the source something!
Here we quote the further communication from "Deep Shield":
15. Could you, "Deep Shield" - be described as a scientist
or...?
Scientist is a good generic term. I do study and research in a
scientific manner. I carry papers and degrees. My official capacity
is in direct research of atmospheric issues in relation to
pollutants. I also create models of potential long-term effects of
green house gasses on the climate. Predict wind patterns, weather
patterns, etc.
I have spent a good many years working on the project
calculating the amount of material needed and creating models for
dispersion patterns. I work other members who know the chemicals used
and their interactions with the atmosphere, pollution and water
vapor. I am part of a team which itself is part of a larger team,
which is part of still a larger team. Government work with many
chiefs and levels above the workers.
16. Are you prepared to comment upon your personal motives for
sharing this information?
Not at this time, no.
17. Have you signed a non-disclosure or Secrets Act document
that specifically relates to this project?
Yes.
18. To your knowledge what categories of individuals officially
know of the Project and are expected to remain silent? For example,
my list of suspects includes government down to the county level,
military especially air force, meteorologists, health specialists,
mainstream media etc.
All those who know are expected to remain silent. All of those
who suspect are either faced with trying to prove the virtually
unprovable or are faced with good enough reasons to remain silent. I
would assume that this situation is worldwide and could be considered
one of the dangers of this project.
It was presented to me as a matter of national security. I can
see the reasons why there is a desire to repress the information not
that spraying is taking place but the hard little fact that we are
facing a period of human history which might be the end of
civilization.
19. Is the mainstream controlled media specifically ordered to
avoid any mention of chemtrails? If so, have you anything further to
add such as how was this done?
I would assume that the Media is controlled by its own desire
to make money from what it reports. Since there is enough debunking
out there, which says that contrails are part of the normal use of
jet engines in the atmosphere, this would leave a reporter with very
little to report unless there was solid evidence or pictures or
something that could not be explained away.
You must know by now all the debunking methods that have been
employed. The 'official' announcements are the media's main dish. The
rest they regulate to the realm of the National Enquirer.
20. What government agency or agencies control this program? Is
it under international control?
It is an international program. Many nations contribute in
different ways. Measures have been taken to insure that what is
sprayed over all countries is the same through triple blind
deliveries; which include not knowing where a certain canister will
end up, not knowing which aircraft a certain canister will be flown,
and not even knowing who (in military craft) will be piloting a craft
which has the purpose of spraying (Note: in today's world there is
usually a mixed crew of different nationalities flying any one
military aircraft on a Shield mission). I believe the Media caught
Canadians in Iraq recently when Canada's official say on the matter
was that Canada was not giving any support to the military might.
The fact remains that there were Canadian military with the USA
forces. Some on aircraft carriers most being pilots. I think you can
connect the dots.
21. How is the project funded - who pays for it? Have you any
idea of the total direct operating cost? Also, does Canada make a
funding contribution for the activities in our skies?
Most governments tend to over charge themselves to cover for
their black operations (unofficial operations). That money comes out
of the collection of taxes. So in effect the taxpayers of the world
are paying for this project.
I would assume Canada does contribute funding to the Project.
Canada is one of the top nations contributing time, material and
funding to this project. Most of the Free World, the Western World,
has taken on most of the burden of the costs.
22. Is the Shield Project the only such aerial spraying program?
Is it the only project designed to avert ecological disaster?
Then yes. There are countless other projects that could be taking
place which include spraying of some sort or another. Pesticides are
usually sprayed. There has been great interest in weather control
such as bringing rain to arid regions and taking the punch out of
hurricanes and typhoons.
Weather control may be one of the final options left to us.
Considering the amount of global warming that has taken place. There
is a strong need to deflect a storm's fury, or to bring rain back to
those regions which have been suffering drought.
What Mother Nature has done for millions of years automatically
may now require mankind's hand to keep the schedule.
23. There are reports of four different chemtrail programs and
other "code" names. For example, see: Holmestead: Chemtrails - what
are they? Any comments?
It is possible that the Military does have a use for similar
sprays. I cannot speak for the Military. However, my own personal
research has come across these things as well. Are they possible?
Yes. Are they practical? Only in the small scale say over the
battlefield, or in the case of say the Iraq War, over Baghdad. Global
application would be far too expensive and would require an obvious
flight pattern of grids, circles and other heavy spray patterns.
24. Is all the spraying done using the "tank kits" described
earlier or are the KC-135R and KC-10 types filled to the brim? Such
aircraft have a load capacity of 200,000 pounds or more for refueling
missions.
No. Several types of craft are used. Commercial jet airliners
are used and they are not diverted from their flight paths to do so.
How the canisters and the spraying is done on this kind of craft is
unknown to me exactly. I do have my suspicions. I know best that
which is my field; this is not to say that we do not talk around the
water tank. So I know more than just my area and am able to think the
matter through to its logical end.
I do know that even all the commercial jetliners in use are not
enough to insure complete coverage all of the time. My computer
models require knowing how much material needs to be sprayed. Certain
conditions cause wide areas to suddenly (over hours) open up in the
Shield. Then and only then is mass spraying done - and would be done
with the most logical craft, a tanker.
Why not spray more from individual jetliners? That is one of
the problems. Jetliners do not carry much material (100 to 500
gallons) because the material has to be spread out thinly.
Look at the kinds of material being used, aluminum, barium,
titanium, etc. Most are highly reflective; in some instances the
material is an absorber of gasses. In the case of reflection the
desire is to reflect X amount of heat and X amount of UV while still
maintaining acceptable (nominal) levels of UV and heat reaching the
planet's surface.
Life requires a certain amount of both UV and Heat too much
will kill - so will too little. The apparent amount looks like a lot
more than what is actually being sprayed per volume of air it is
covering. Most of the whitening of the sky is not the material per
se, but the collection of water vapor, which forms into suspended ice
crystals. The introduction of the material causes the water vapor to
collect like rain collects on individual particles of dust.
Too much material would cause a "mud fall" of sorts where the
naturally occurring water vapor would precipitate carrying the
material with it.
Spraying is done in such away as to "layer" the material
through a volume that will allow an acceptable level of UV and heat
through along with all the other wavelengths of light. Photosynthesis
is the foundation of life on our planet.
Only when all the material is removed in a local area does it
require a massive spray, this is usually in the front of a weather
system, or after a heavy period of precipitation. Then a tanker is
flown, fully loaded.
25. Is there any truth in the story that some of the spraying
is done by jetliners with modifications in the "honey" or waste
compartment? For example, see mechanic story: Mechanic.
The technology used for spraying is rather simple. It requires
at least two tanks under pressure, each carries half of the mixture
which is sprayed at the same time forming a complete compound which
is designed to be lightweight (so as to be suspended for longer
periods of time).
There have been attempts to incorporate the materials in jet
fuel, however the material binds with unburned jet fuel, water vapor,
etc and does not have the added buoyancy of the polymer threads. The
end result is a spray that is less than half as effective and is more
dangerous since it can lead to sulfates, acids and other mixtures,
which are more lethal than the spray.
It is very possible that the "honey" compartment is used. The
amount of material needed is small compared to the payload of any
given commercial airliner.
However, there is a good deal of fuel tank that is not used.
Airliners only fuel their craft for the journey ahead of them; they
rarely top off the tank. This has become public knowledge in light of
9-11. It was this small fact that caused the terrorists to pick pan-
continental flights so they would have a plane fully loaded.
The majority of flights are short range and do not require the
full capacity of an airliners fuel tanks. Any adaptations needed
could easily be done during routine maintenance, and could be easily
explained away as being a modification for safety and-or pollution
controls.
This last is my own theory.
We can assume that any means possible to deliver the material
is tried. Independent nations may favor one way of doing so over
another.
26. Where are the official sources that state that a certain
number of people (worldwide?) will sicken and possibly die as a
result of the spraying? In other words, what *internal* studies have
been done on the health issues and who carried them out?
WHO (World Health Organization) carried out most of the
studies. Other nations have carried their own research on the matter.
Some have said the ill effects will be minimal - along the lines of a
million or so, while others have found the numbers to be far higher -
3 to 4 billion.
Some of the organizations include the CDC and independent labs.
We are dealing with a situation where the amount of contamination is
estimated to be far higher than what would normally take place but is
far lower than historical instances of industrial contamination. This
is important to note, the only real history we have with
barium/aluminum/titanium etc. contamination is through factory
workers, miners, etc, who receive a far greater dosage of the
material than what is to be experienced by the populace under the
Shield.
The amount of spray is very small compared to the volume of the
space that is covered. Most of the harmful chemicals that are used
are being dissipated over vast areas. Near coastal regions the fall
out is not reaching land at all, but is being carried out to the
oceans. The addition of polymers to make the material remain
suspended in the air longer means that less material is being used.
Today the material used and its application is nothing like in
the early days when it was sprayed in greater quantities and settling
far faster to be inhaled by all.
The accepted Estimated Casualties (from WHO) is 2 billion over
the course of 6 decades. The majority will be either the elderly, or
those who are prone to respiratory problems. These numbers are based
on the current estimates of the general health of the population, the
average age and the occurrence of respiratory problems as a health
issue. All are estimates since there are no solid numbers to work
with.
27. Could you summarize the root causes of the initial
destruction of the atmosphere that requires this "repair" work? Did
it perhaps result in part from fluorides released/produced by the
nuclear weapons programs?
In a word - Industry. Most fail to understand that the products
we use, wear and live with are made in a manner that dumps CFC's and
green houses gasses into the atmosphere. There is no one single
causative in this issue. It goes way back to the Industrial
Revolution and the use of coal to power steam engines. Since that
time we have consumed greater and greater energy resources, dumping
the waste where ever we wanted.
Up until very recently refrigeration was a big contributor,
imagine all those hundreds of millions of households that owned and
operated freon cooled refrigerators from 1940 to 1970. Not just one
refrigerator per household, but over the course of time often
multiple freon units. This doesn't include the various air
conditioner systems or industrial refrigeration systems.
For a long period when the refrigerator or air conditioner unit
was replaced, the old one was taken to the dump and thrown into the
heap - the freon was free to escape and make its way up into the
stratosphere to eat away at the ozone layer.
You can add to that list. Think of all the cars that had air
conditioners, think of all those hair spray cans with their
propellant gasses - the amount of those alone were enough to do great
damage.
Styrofoam is another industry and product that has contributed
to the problem. In the scheme of things atomic energy has contributed
little compared to the consumer goods that have been manufactured
during the past century.
Think of all the cars on the road today. In the late 1970's
smog controls started getting stronger. Think of all the pre-1978
cars on the road - they are still producing a good many chemicals
that leech into every corner of the globe.
28. Have you any comment on the use of so-called "CloudBusters"
based upon the theories of Wilhelm Reich? For an example of this see:
CloudBuster.
I could go on for hours about the particular errors of this
site. Let us just cut to the chase: I seriously doubt that this
machine does as it is reported to do. I could be wrong, but then I do
not work with alternative energy sources such as Orgone energy.
--- End forwarded message ---
"Mark Davey" wrote:
"Everyone talks about the weather,
but nobody does anything about it."
The following is a letter (e-mail) written by a friend of a
correspondent. The writer appears to have an "inside track" on the
chemtrail spraying programme. There was an opportunity to ask
specific questions relating to the aerial spraying and the "insider"
then answered the questions.
I am aware of the insider's place of employment and the facts
presented conform with the type of activities that are carried out
there.
The responses have the tone of someone with detailed inside
knowledge but for reasons of confidentiality it is unsigned. Where
population is mentioned also see the Holmestead Population Explosion
page.
It is a lengthy piece but when you reach the end please
continue as there is a second item following.
At 4 April 2003 some supplementary questions and answers have
been added. This makes the piece even longer and again the related
item follows. If you wish to skip the first section and go directly
to the new material click: Supplementary.
Points to Ponder: The Shield Project.
Here we quote the communication from "Deep Shield":
Having read your email, I must say that you are full of
questions. These questions I would dismiss immediately as being the
frustrated attempts of fringe groups to bring a halt to the project,
however these reports of biological material being part of the spray
should be addressed. Therefore I will give as much attention to all
of your questions as possible.
1. What purpose do polymer threads imbedded with biological
material serve in this scenario?
Polymers are part of the mixture and they do form in threads
and in `tufts'. The idea is simple and comes to us from the spider.
As you may know spider webbing is very light, some newborn spiders
spin a `parachute' to catch the prevailing breeze to travel far from
their place of birth. Spiders have been able to attain high altitudes
and travel great distances for long periods of time. Most of the
elements used in the spray are heavier than air, even in their
powdered form they are heavier and will sink quickly. Mixing them
with the polymers suspends the particles in the atmosphere high above
the surface for longer periods of time, therefore in theory we do not
need to spray as often or as much material. Since the suspended
particles eventually do settle into the lowest part of the atmosphere
and are inhaled by all life forms on the surface there is an attempt
to counter the growth of mold by adding to the mixture mold growth
suppressants - some of which may be of biological material.
Mold comes in spores that travel on the winds; the polymers can
attract mold spores through static charges created by the friction of
the polymer threads and the atmosphere. Add a bit of warmth and
moisture and mold begins to grow. The polymer is stored in a liquid
form as two separate chemicals. When sprayed they combine behind the
plane `spinning' long polymer chains (threads). Much tinkering has
been done which the chemical matrix in past years. Many polymers
(plastics) are non-biodegradable thus add to the problem of
pollution. Various formula have been used, some which even use
biological agents. It would be great if we could reproduce the same
web material that spiders make, it is extremely strong, extremely
lightweight and breaks down relatively fast in the ecology.
2. If this spraying is to mitigate global warming, why does so
much of it take place at night?
Though it would appear that the dispersal rate of the spray is
fast, it is actually takes much longer to be an effective shield.
There is a desired concentration being sought. One that is thick
enough to stem the UV and the Infrared, while being thin enough to
allow visible light through. A perpetual cloud cover would have
disastrous effects on plant life; the food chain thus disrupted would
soon collapse. The desired effect wanted is a thin cover that would
theoretically create a daytime haze that allows plenty of sunlight
while providing protection. From UV radiation and also reflect enough
infrared to maintain nominal temperatures.
The optimal condition is to use the least amount of material to
provide the maximum amount of shielding. Ideally that would be a one-
time application which would stay suspended for years, however, as
noted, barium and aluminum and other trace elements are far heavier
than air and they sink rather rapidly. The different temperatures
between day and night causes massive volumes of air to rise during
the night, the warm air trapped at the surface rises above the
cooling air above. By strategically spraying in certain areas at
night, we get the advantage of the rising air, which not only pushes
the material higher, but also causes the material to disperse into a
thin layer.
I would suggest studying on the subject of weather, namely
highs and lows and how air moves to fully understand the times of
spraying. I note, it is not just global warming we are combating
here, we are also combating UV Summer. Global warming could
effectively be treated by applications during the night, when the
warm air rises. However the UV needs to be treated during the day.
This is why on some days one finds that more spraying is done during
the day. The UV indexes are monitored constantly for local areas. If
the problem were simply cooling the earth, rockets would have been
used to suspend particles in the high atmosphere. However the
delicate nature of the Ozone Layer precludes this method of
shielding. More on this in the answer to Question 6.
3. What other military programs are in place involving the
spraying of barium and what are their purposes? Do you know and
understand the chemical make up of the element?
A little knowledge will go a long way to understanding the need
to use barium: Barium is often used in barium-nickel alloys for spark-
plug electrodes and in vacuum tubes as a drying and oxygen-removing
agent. Barium oxidizes in air, and it reacts vigorously with water to
form the hydroxide, liberating hydrogen. In moist air it may
spontaneously ignite. It burns in air to form the peroxide, which
produces hydrogen peroxide when treated with water. Barium reacts
with almost all of the nonmetals; all of its water-soluble and acid-
soluble compounds are poisonous. Barium carbonate is used in glass,
as a pottery glaze, and as a rat poison. Chrome yellow (barium
chromate) is used as a paint pigment and in safety matches. The
chlorate and nitrate are used in pyrotechnics to provide a green
color. Barium oxide strongly absorbs carbon dioxide and water; it is
used as a drying agent. Barium chloride is used in medicinal
preparations and as a water softener. Barium sulfide phosphoresces
after exposure to light; it is sometimes used as a paint pigment.
Barite, the sulfate ore, has many industrial uses. Because barium
sulfate is virtually insoluble in water and acids, it can be used to
coat the alimentary tract to increase the contrast for X-ray
photography without being absorbed by the body and poisoning the
subject.
Note what Barium Oxide can do, absorb carbon dioxide - one of
the chief gasses causing the green house effect. In my answer to
Question 4 I will discuss the need to carry a current in the shield.
I would like to point out that barium and aluminum work together to
diffuse and strengthen an electrical charge. Somewhat like the
current produced when acid is introduced between two dissimilar
metals, such as iron and copper. There are military applications for
everything you can think of, can not a butter knife be used as a
weapon? The same concept holds true here.
4. What is the connection between ELF, EMF, VLF and Chemtrails
spraying? Or is there one?
To understand the use of radio waves in the shield, one first
understands how ozone is created. I cannot stress to you how dire the
situation really is. The shield in place is only a partial solution;
we must counter the depletion of the ozone- this means we must make
ozone in the stratosphere. Ozone at ground levels does no good;
indeed, ozone pollution at ground levels it what is used to determine
the air quality. Higher levels of ground level ozone mean that air
quality is bad. Pure ozone is an unstable, faintly bluish gas with a
characteristic fresh, penetrating odor. The gas has a density of
2.144 grams per liter at standard temperature and pressure. Below its
boiling point (-112?) ozone is a dark blue liquid; below its melting
point (-193?) it is a blue-black crystalline solid. Ozone is
triatomic oxygen, O3, and has a molecular weight of 47.9982 atomic
mass units (amu). It is the most chemically active form of oxygen. It
is formed in the ozone layer of the stratosphere by the action of
solar ultraviolet light on oxygen. Although it is present in this
layer only to an extent of about 10 parts per million, ozone is
important because its formation prevents most ultraviolet and other
high-energy radiation, which is harmful to life, from penetrating to
the earth's surface. Ultraviolet light is absorbed when its strikes
an ozone molecule; the molecule is split into atomic and diatomic
oxygen: 03+ ultraviolet light ->0+02. Later, in the presence of a
catalyst, the atomic and diatomic oxygen reunite to form ozone.
Ozone is also formed when an electric discharge passes through
air; for example, it is formed by lightning and by some electric
motors and generators. Ozone is produced commercially by passing dry
air between two concentric-tube or plate electrodes connected to an
alternating high voltage; this is called the silent electric
discharge method. Since UV radiation is the problem, we can not use
UV to produce more stratospheric ozone. Another method must be found.
The shield acts like one plate of the electrode, when tickled with
certain radio waves; it produces an opposite charge to stratospheric
layers producing low atmosphere to stratosphere lightening. Creating
ozone where it is needed.
5. If this is being done for the reasons you say, then why are
other chemicals being used, why are different sprays being used?
Correcting the ecological damage that mankind has done has
NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE. We are relatively new to this notion of
terraforming on a real scale. That is what we are doing,
Terraforming. We are trying to recreate the ideal life-sustaining
conditions on a dying planet. We have never done this before, not
intentionally. We are testing and trying different methods. Granted,
if we do nothing 89% of all species will go extinct and humanity
stands a high chance of not surviving through two more generations
(or less). However the idea of 2 billion casualties death and
permanent injury is not easy to swallow either.
Several attempts to improve the application of Shielding
material and getting the most out of each application are taking
place all the time. The combined resources of the nations of earth
are not enough to allow constant spraying. Though we have achieved a
high level of technology, there is a great surface area that needs to
be covered nearly daily. Large sections of ocean are all but ignored;
the remaining land masses are more than what can be covered
effectively. The Shield would work best if it was a single thin layer
with out interruption, however due to the movement of air, weather
patterns and the sad fact that we do not have the means to place
ample amounts of material at the same level at the same time we are
getting a small fraction of the effectiveness from our applications.
6. Why is spraying found before storm fronts? Is it to cause
drought?
Before a storm there is a front, the front clears the air
before a storm, pushing particulate matter ahead of it, leaving a
space relatively clear of particulate matter. UV radiation levels
rise in these areas, sometimes to dangerous levels. The shield must
be maintained. Since barium absorbs water as well as carbon dioxide,
precipitation has been affected. Other kinds of sprays are in
development and testing which may reduce the affects on
precipitation. As I stated above, this is a new technology we are
working with, it is still in its infancy and there are some problems
with it.
7. Why are UFO's and disappearing spray planes reported?
I do not know.
8. What about the reports of sickness after spraying?
There are several causatives for this. Some people are more
sensitive to metals, whiles others are sensitive to the polymer
chemicals. As stated in a previous email, people will get sick, and
some will die. It is estimated that 2 billion worldwide will be
affected to some degree by the spraying. Without spraying we have a
90% + chance of becoming extinct as a species with in the next 20
years.
9. What is the relationship between these spraying programs and
One World Order?
Personally I am against the move for globalization, and yes,
there is potential to use the Shield to speed up the process of
globalization, there are several countries that are involved in this
project: European Union Nations, USA and Russia are the largest
contributors to the project, many of the allied nations and UN
Members participate to one extent or another. The material (chemical
spray as you may call it) comes from all of these nations.
To insure that the chemicals are not tampered with, they are
mixed and sprayed over random nations. This means that chemicals
produced in the USA has a good chance of being sprayed over Russia,
England and the USA. This random spray of material means that no
nation would be certain that their chemicals will be sprayed over a
nation which they have issues with. Russian planes may be seen in USA
skies, but so too will USA planes be seen in Russian skies. The
canisters used are sealed in a third nation that has no idea where
its canister is going. Participating nations have their observers at
every station where canister loading is done. All of this to insure
that the shield is not used as a weapon. To further insure that the
shield is not used as a weapon, non participant nations are sprayed
by participants who must spray in order to get enough material to
maintain their nations shield. It is understood that not spraying is
as much a military offense as shooting at them.
Without the shield, UV poisoning would cause great death. The
threat is a common one, which has brought nations together in
defense. The natural outcome of having a common enemy is to
strengthen international ties - a step toward globalization.
10. Is the Spraying related to terrorism?
Yes and no. Recent terrorist activity can be traced to
resistance groups who feel that we should not interfere with the
natural order of things. As you know, there are many rumors out there
as to what the Shield Program is. Some believe that this is a
population reduction scheme, designed to kill off 'undesirable'
peoples. While others hold that this is a mind control program. There
are many theories which have sinister plots in them these are
propagated by the resistance groups in an attempt to stop the shield
regardless of the consequences.
The same delivery method could be used for biological and
chemical warfare. It could also be used to inoculate large
populations, the effectiveness of these uses are low, there are
better methods that can be used. As a means to fight terrorism it is
ineffectual, it is far easier to inoculate a population individually
and would insure full inoculation against germ warfare.
11. Why all the secrecy?
Due to the severity of the situation it is mandatory to
maintain public calm for as long as possible. The Earth is dying.
Humanity is on the road to extinction - without the Shield mankind
will die off with in 20 to 50 years. Most people alive today could
live to see this extinction take place. This means that an
announcement of the situation we face boils down to telling every
man, woman and child on earth that they have no future, they are
going to be killed. People would panic. There would be economic
collapse, the production and movement of goods would collapse.
Millions would die in all cities on earth, riots and violence would
reduce civilian centers to rubble within days. Half of the population
in dense metropolitan areas would try to leave the cities
seeking 'safety' in the rural areas thinking that they would be safe.
Those left behind in the cities would be at war with their neighbors,
fighting for the remaining supplies. We would be telling the world
that the world is coming to an end, and even with the Shield the
chances of survival are small.
UV Summer and Global Warming are the immediate problems we
face, there are far greater problems that are raising their ugly
heads and will present new problems which in some cases have no
viable solutions at this time. Ecologies are collapsing. The
extinction rate of species is climbing. The amount of chemical
pollutants in the water and soil are fast approaching and in many
places has surpassed the earth's ability to heal itself. Crop failure
is on the rise, even in the USA the returns on crops are smaller than
they were 10 years ago. Even with the advances in genetically altered
food crops, we are falling behind in our ability to produce enough to
go around. Throughout the 20th century chemical fertilizers and
pesticides were used to insure the best yields. Unfortunately many of
these have contaminated ground water, killed beneficial insects along
with the undesirable insects. These chemicals have gotten into the
food chain and are affected other species besides mankind. It is only
a matter of years before famine spreads like a cancer throughout the
world.
Clean fresh water is in short supply, in many places well water
is nonpotable, containing the run off of pesticides, herbicides and
fertilizers that have been used on crops and lawns. The water
treatment facilities we have are unable to scrub out all of the
toxins we have placed in the soil and water supply. Many of the
toxins we find build up over time in the body, a long slow poisoning
which has been making its presence felt in many areas of the world in
the form of cancers, leukemia, sterility, birth defects, learning
disorders, immune deficiency problems, etc. These are on the rise,
any good researcher can find the records. For decades there was
public outcry for the end to pollution. For every small step we made
to clean up our production, millions where born who added to the
problem. Yes, pollution is down per individual, however there are a
couple more billion individuals producing pollution, thus the real
numbers have an increase in over all pollution produced. Name a city
that does not have problems with smog. You would be hard pressed to
find one. Though smog controls on automobiles is higher than ever
before, the number of autos on the road has increased thus the amount
of smog producing pollutants is higher than ever before. All the
clean air acts passed to curb individual factory and auto emissions
did not address the production of more factories and more autos. Here
an uneasy compromise was made between the need to maintain the
economy against the need to maintain the ecology. The ecology lost
since it was estimated to be a problem decades from now. The economy
was a problem that would have dire effects today.
All of these factors combined have produced a scenario that in
shorts boils down to the end of the world in 50 to 75 years. Even if
we were to stop all emissions of pollution today, the inertia of past
decades is enough to carry us over the brink in 100 years. However we
cannot stop the production of pollution, to do so would mean shutting
down every factory, every auto, every train, truck, ship and every
household on the planet. Electricity is used to heat many homes in
the Western World. The production of electricity produces fewer
pollutants than heating all homes with wood or coal. Cutting our
power generation abilities down to hydroelectric and fission reactors
would leave a good chunk of the world in the dark. It is an
impossible situation, our civilization is geared to the use of
energy, take away our energy and civilization will collapse.
12. When will spraying stop?
There are several factors governing this:
A. Should the Ozone layer repair itself or our active attempts
at repair reduces the amount of ground level UV to acceptable levels,
spraying will stop. Present calculations place this between 2018 and
2024.
B. Should another method be found which is more effective, less
costly or presents us with long-term solutions the Shield project
would be replaced.
C. When the other problems become too big to make the
maintenance of the shield worth the effort. The estimated date for
this is 2025 to 2050.
13. Since Global Warming and UV summer are the problem, why is
the Government backing down on its pollution controls?
Because they are ineffectual and will cause more economic
problems than they would solve ecological problems. We surpassed the
threshold of Earth's ability to absorb pollutants in the 1970's.
Since that time the earth's population has nearly doubled. Emerging
Industrial nations have come into being, more pollutants are produced
now than back then, even with the stringent controls in place. The
world is heading for economic depression, more emission controls
would add to the economic problems. This translates into our being
unable to do anything to start solving the problems.
Unfortunately our technologies require a strong economy to
advance. We need that advancement, we need the trillions of dollars
spent on research that a strong economy causes. Each corporation that
produces a product has a product development program in place. Many
of the past products invented came by accident through other
unrelated products. There is a corporate drive to find methods to
clean up the ecology, to reduce emissions, etc. These goals have been
in place for decades, many of the large corporations are in the know
when it comes to the ecological problems we face thus they are
spending a great deal of money and time on finding solutions to the
problems we face. Take away the economy and their research stops.
14. How are you related to the Chemtrails? How do you know that
this is what is happening?
I would prefer to not state who I am or how I am related to all
of this. To validate what I say, would require a bit of research on
your behalf. I would recommend the following subjects to look up and
study:
A. Population numbers for industrial nations and the tons of
pollutants produced annually. Start with 1975 and work your way up.
B. Number of emerging Industrial Nations.
C. Number of cases of Skin cancers worldwide.
D. Crop Production vs. land area dedicated to crop production.
Simple math will show that more acreage is needed to produce food per
individual.
E. Automobile production from 1975 to present, estimated number
of autos on the road and the average emissions of later model cars
produced as compared the emissions of earlier model cars. A little
math will show that though individual autos produce less emissions,
the amount of emissions has risen due to the number of autos on the
road. Remember that many autos are the road that were built before
present emission control standards. 1980 is a cut off date - anything
put on the road before then produces more pollutants than autos
produced today. I would include research in the number of diesel
autos produced, diesel has not been under the emissions control acts.
F. Severity of storms and the number of severe storms. Also
include heat waves and droughts in that research, you will find that
the numbers are staggering when compared to data from 1950, 1960 and
1970.
G. Research how naturally occurring Ozone is produced in the
stratosphere. Compare to how it is produced industrially.
H. Research political reforms in the past 30 years, see which
political institutions have changed, which nations have joined with
whom. Concentrate more on these from 1982 onward. This would include
the fall of the Wall and Iron Curtain.
I. Research polymers and how they are made, look at recent
research done in biological polymers, medical polymers and filaments.
J. Check out spiders and spider web and the way spiders use
their different webs and threads.
K. Research clean fresh water estimates as compared to the
1970's to today - world wide.
L. Research the following medical conditions per capita: Birth
Defects Cancers Leukemia Immune deficiency diseases (excluding virus
borne ID illnesses such as HIV) Occurrences of Learning disabilities,
including dyslexia, ADD, and over all IQ tests Sterility for both
male and females world wide Instances of glaucoma and cataracts.
M. Compare the history of UV indexes from 1970 to present. You
may note that it was on sharp rise until 1997-99.
N. I would strongly recommend researching the reactions of
different barium and aluminum compounds and how they are used.
Research how long it takes for these metals in pure form to oxidize,
how they combine with nitrates, carbon monoxide carbon dioxide and
fluorocarbons and hydrocarbons and water vapor.
O. Research how mold propagates, the conditions it needs to
grow and just how abundant it is in the atmosphere.
If you pursue these lines of inquiry, you will see the Shield
Project as it really is.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
At the time of the US-lead invasion of Iraq I had the
opportunity to ask a few supplementary questions. There has been no
attempt to integrate these questions and answers into the previous
section therefore some may appear somewhat out of logical order.
A couple of the questions have a Canadian approach. By the
way, I came up with the name - have to call the source something!
Here we quote the further communication from "Deep Shield":
15. Could you, "Deep Shield" - be described as a scientist
or...?
Scientist is a good generic term. I do study and research in a
scientific manner. I carry papers and degrees. My official capacity
is in direct research of atmospheric issues in relation to
pollutants. I also create models of potential long-term effects of
green house gasses on the climate. Predict wind patterns, weather
patterns, etc.
I have spent a good many years working on the project
calculating the amount of material needed and creating models for
dispersion patterns. I work other members who know the chemicals used
and their interactions with the atmosphere, pollution and water
vapor. I am part of a team which itself is part of a larger team,
which is part of still a larger team. Government work with many
chiefs and levels above the workers.
16. Are you prepared to comment upon your personal motives for
sharing this information?
Not at this time, no.
17. Have you signed a non-disclosure or Secrets Act document
that specifically relates to this project?
Yes.
18. To your knowledge what categories of individuals officially
know of the Project and are expected to remain silent? For example,
my list of suspects includes government down to the county level,
military especially air force, meteorologists, health specialists,
mainstream media etc.
All those who know are expected to remain silent. All of those
who suspect are either faced with trying to prove the virtually
unprovable or are faced with good enough reasons to remain silent. I
would assume that this situation is worldwide and could be considered
one of the dangers of this project.
It was presented to me as a matter of national security. I can
see the reasons why there is a desire to repress the information not
that spraying is taking place but the hard little fact that we are
facing a period of human history which might be the end of
civilization.
19. Is the mainstream controlled media specifically ordered to
avoid any mention of chemtrails? If so, have you anything further to
add such as how was this done?
I would assume that the Media is controlled by its own desire
to make money from what it reports. Since there is enough debunking
out there, which says that contrails are part of the normal use of
jet engines in the atmosphere, this would leave a reporter with very
little to report unless there was solid evidence or pictures or
something that could not be explained away.
You must know by now all the debunking methods that have been
employed. The 'official' announcements are the media's main dish. The
rest they regulate to the realm of the National Enquirer.
20. What government agency or agencies control this program? Is
it under international control?
It is an international program. Many nations contribute in
different ways. Measures have been taken to insure that what is
sprayed over all countries is the same through triple blind
deliveries; which include not knowing where a certain canister will
end up, not knowing which aircraft a certain canister will be flown,
and not even knowing who (in military craft) will be piloting a craft
which has the purpose of spraying (Note: in today's world there is
usually a mixed crew of different nationalities flying any one
military aircraft on a Shield mission). I believe the Media caught
Canadians in Iraq recently when Canada's official say on the matter
was that Canada was not giving any support to the military might.
The fact remains that there were Canadian military with the USA
forces. Some on aircraft carriers most being pilots. I think you can
connect the dots.
21. How is the project funded - who pays for it? Have you any
idea of the total direct operating cost? Also, does Canada make a
funding contribution for the activities in our skies?
Most governments tend to over charge themselves to cover for
their black operations (unofficial operations). That money comes out
of the collection of taxes. So in effect the taxpayers of the world
are paying for this project.
I would assume Canada does contribute funding to the Project.
Canada is one of the top nations contributing time, material and
funding to this project. Most of the Free World, the Western World,
has taken on most of the burden of the costs.
22. Is the Shield Project the only such aerial spraying program?
Is it the only project designed to avert ecological disaster?
Then yes. There are countless other projects that could be taking
place which include spraying of some sort or another. Pesticides are
usually sprayed. There has been great interest in weather control
such as bringing rain to arid regions and taking the punch out of
hurricanes and typhoons.
Weather control may be one of the final options left to us.
Considering the amount of global warming that has taken place. There
is a strong need to deflect a storm's fury, or to bring rain back to
those regions which have been suffering drought.
What Mother Nature has done for millions of years automatically
may now require mankind's hand to keep the schedule.
23. There are reports of four different chemtrail programs and
other "code" names. For example, see: Holmestead: Chemtrails - what
are they? Any comments?
It is possible that the Military does have a use for similar
sprays. I cannot speak for the Military. However, my own personal
research has come across these things as well. Are they possible?
Yes. Are they practical? Only in the small scale say over the
battlefield, or in the case of say the Iraq War, over Baghdad. Global
application would be far too expensive and would require an obvious
flight pattern of grids, circles and other heavy spray patterns.
24. Is all the spraying done using the "tank kits" described
earlier or are the KC-135R and KC-10 types filled to the brim? Such
aircraft have a load capacity of 200,000 pounds or more for refueling
missions.
No. Several types of craft are used. Commercial jet airliners
are used and they are not diverted from their flight paths to do so.
How the canisters and the spraying is done on this kind of craft is
unknown to me exactly. I do have my suspicions. I know best that
which is my field; this is not to say that we do not talk around the
water tank. So I know more than just my area and am able to think the
matter through to its logical end.
I do know that even all the commercial jetliners in use are not
enough to insure complete coverage all of the time. My computer
models require knowing how much material needs to be sprayed. Certain
conditions cause wide areas to suddenly (over hours) open up in the
Shield. Then and only then is mass spraying done - and would be done
with the most logical craft, a tanker.
Why not spray more from individual jetliners? That is one of
the problems. Jetliners do not carry much material (100 to 500
gallons) because the material has to be spread out thinly.
Look at the kinds of material being used, aluminum, barium,
titanium, etc. Most are highly reflective; in some instances the
material is an absorber of gasses. In the case of reflection the
desire is to reflect X amount of heat and X amount of UV while still
maintaining acceptable (nominal) levels of UV and heat reaching the
planet's surface.
Life requires a certain amount of both UV and Heat too much
will kill - so will too little. The apparent amount looks like a lot
more than what is actually being sprayed per volume of air it is
covering. Most of the whitening of the sky is not the material per
se, but the collection of water vapor, which forms into suspended ice
crystals. The introduction of the material causes the water vapor to
collect like rain collects on individual particles of dust.
Too much material would cause a "mud fall" of sorts where the
naturally occurring water vapor would precipitate carrying the
material with it.
Spraying is done in such away as to "layer" the material
through a volume that will allow an acceptable level of UV and heat
through along with all the other wavelengths of light. Photosynthesis
is the foundation of life on our planet.
Only when all the material is removed in a local area does it
require a massive spray, this is usually in the front of a weather
system, or after a heavy period of precipitation. Then a tanker is
flown, fully loaded.
25. Is there any truth in the story that some of the spraying
is done by jetliners with modifications in the "honey" or waste
compartment? For example, see mechanic story: Mechanic.
The technology used for spraying is rather simple. It requires
at least two tanks under pressure, each carries half of the mixture
which is sprayed at the same time forming a complete compound which
is designed to be lightweight (so as to be suspended for longer
periods of time).
There have been attempts to incorporate the materials in jet
fuel, however the material binds with unburned jet fuel, water vapor,
etc and does not have the added buoyancy of the polymer threads. The
end result is a spray that is less than half as effective and is more
dangerous since it can lead to sulfates, acids and other mixtures,
which are more lethal than the spray.
It is very possible that the "honey" compartment is used. The
amount of material needed is small compared to the payload of any
given commercial airliner.
However, there is a good deal of fuel tank that is not used.
Airliners only fuel their craft for the journey ahead of them; they
rarely top off the tank. This has become public knowledge in light of
9-11. It was this small fact that caused the terrorists to pick pan-
continental flights so they would have a plane fully loaded.
The majority of flights are short range and do not require the
full capacity of an airliners fuel tanks. Any adaptations needed
could easily be done during routine maintenance, and could be easily
explained away as being a modification for safety and-or pollution
controls.
This last is my own theory.
We can assume that any means possible to deliver the material
is tried. Independent nations may favor one way of doing so over
another.
26. Where are the official sources that state that a certain
number of people (worldwide?) will sicken and possibly die as a
result of the spraying? In other words, what *internal* studies have
been done on the health issues and who carried them out?
WHO (World Health Organization) carried out most of the
studies. Other nations have carried their own research on the matter.
Some have said the ill effects will be minimal - along the lines of a
million or so, while others have found the numbers to be far higher -
3 to 4 billion.
Some of the organizations include the CDC and independent labs.
We are dealing with a situation where the amount of contamination is
estimated to be far higher than what would normally take place but is
far lower than historical instances of industrial contamination. This
is important to note, the only real history we have with
barium/aluminum/titanium etc. contamination is through factory
workers, miners, etc, who receive a far greater dosage of the
material than what is to be experienced by the populace under the
Shield.
The amount of spray is very small compared to the volume of the
space that is covered. Most of the harmful chemicals that are used
are being dissipated over vast areas. Near coastal regions the fall
out is not reaching land at all, but is being carried out to the
oceans. The addition of polymers to make the material remain
suspended in the air longer means that less material is being used.
Today the material used and its application is nothing like in
the early days when it was sprayed in greater quantities and settling
far faster to be inhaled by all.
The accepted Estimated Casualties (from WHO) is 2 billion over
the course of 6 decades. The majority will be either the elderly, or
those who are prone to respiratory problems. These numbers are based
on the current estimates of the general health of the population, the
average age and the occurrence of respiratory problems as a health
issue. All are estimates since there are no solid numbers to work
with.
27. Could you summarize the root causes of the initial
destruction of the atmosphere that requires this "repair" work? Did
it perhaps result in part from fluorides released/produced by the
nuclear weapons programs?
In a word - Industry. Most fail to understand that the products
we use, wear and live with are made in a manner that dumps CFC's and
green houses gasses into the atmosphere. There is no one single
causative in this issue. It goes way back to the Industrial
Revolution and the use of coal to power steam engines. Since that
time we have consumed greater and greater energy resources, dumping
the waste where ever we wanted.
Up until very recently refrigeration was a big contributor,
imagine all those hundreds of millions of households that owned and
operated freon cooled refrigerators from 1940 to 1970. Not just one
refrigerator per household, but over the course of time often
multiple freon units. This doesn't include the various air
conditioner systems or industrial refrigeration systems.
For a long period when the refrigerator or air conditioner unit
was replaced, the old one was taken to the dump and thrown into the
heap - the freon was free to escape and make its way up into the
stratosphere to eat away at the ozone layer.
You can add to that list. Think of all the cars that had air
conditioners, think of all those hair spray cans with their
propellant gasses - the amount of those alone were enough to do great
damage.
Styrofoam is another industry and product that has contributed
to the problem. In the scheme of things atomic energy has contributed
little compared to the consumer goods that have been manufactured
during the past century.
Think of all the cars on the road today. In the late 1970's
smog controls started getting stronger. Think of all the pre-1978
cars on the road - they are still producing a good many chemicals
that leech into every corner of the globe.
28. Have you any comment on the use of so-called "CloudBusters"
based upon the theories of Wilhelm Reich? For an example of this see:
CloudBuster.
I could go on for hours about the particular errors of this
site. Let us just cut to the chase: I seriously doubt that this
machine does as it is reported to do. I could be wrong, but then I do
not work with alternative energy sources such as Orgone energy.
--- End forwarded message ---
// posted by Linda Weissinger Lupowitz @ 8:06 PM
P S -- in case it isn't obvious --
the article which precedes this post,
about Zoloft for Everything, was from
The Onion --
worth a visit, because it is just very clever
humor, not actually true. But it is funny!
the article which precedes this post,
about Zoloft for Everything, was from
The Onion --
worth a visit, because it is just very clever
humor, not actually true. But it is funny!
// posted by Linda Weissinger Lupowitz @ 6:51 PM
I have not posted on this blog for over 2 months (!) --
I am rather surprised to note this lapse...
I intend to begin regular postings of stuff I come across,
as a way of saving certain material I have found to be
of interest....If you want to come along, come back.
I am rather surprised to note this lapse...
I intend to begin regular postings of stuff I come across,
as a way of saving certain material I have found to be
of interest....If you want to come along, come back.
// posted by Linda Weissinger Lupowitz @ 6:14 PM
